Symbolism, according to art historians, was a movement that began around 1880 and ended in the 1920s. If you are into boundaries and barriers, that definition works just fine. I’m not. It doesn’t.
As opposed to Impressionism, with its commitment to the reality of the surface, Symbolism was a more holistic view as an artistic and a literary movement. It suggested ideas through symbols and emphasized the meaning behind the forms. Symbolism was a precursor of modernism. It developed fresh, abstract expression of psychological truth suggesting that behind the physical world lay a spiritual reality. Symbolists could take the ineffable, such as a dream or vision, and give it form.
“Underlying Truth” is about illusion – What we believe. What we see. And how that eclipses the foundational truth.
Symbolism is not limited to a movement. It is an enduring method of communication. Jung explains that through exploration of symbols one will eventually discover its fundamental archetype. That succinctly summarizes my path from sketch to sculpture. Art is a process of discovery through query and response. The object created is a summary of that process. The real art is the doing.
Communicating through symbols isn’t a conscious decision for me. Symbols have always been a comfortable vehicle for me to absorb and transmit information. They invite many levels of interpretation. The message can be suggestive, timeless, universal, grand.
I use visual metaphors as a form of poetry expressed in multiple languages at once. The symbols I use are gestural – human, animal and combinations of the two.
The infinite variations of gesture are the root of story telling. Abstracting the form, like editing text, is a process of eliminating anything that doesn’t contribute to the story. What’s left invites viewers to explore and encounter their own archetypes.